Cases 1 - 10 of 307
MIRUMILOVNY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT LLC v. Cherry et al
as 0:2024cv60827
Plaintiff:
MIRUMILOVNY REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT LLC
Defendant:
Tame Cherry, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Montanez v. Gagosian et al
as 5:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Mario Montanez
Defendant:
Steve Gagosian, Troy Stpiette and John/Jane Doe
Resicap Georgia Owner, LLC v. John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02037
Plaintiff:
Resicap Georgia Owner, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe and Carique Spence
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
67 Park Lane Holding Corp. v. Ramzan et al
as 2:2024cv03308
Plaintiff:
67 Park Lane Holding Corp.
Defendant:
Bibi Ramzan, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
18-00003 IH Borrower LP v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
2018-3 IH Borrower LP
Defendant:
John Doe and Herman Roche-Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
New Residential Borrower 2022-SFR2, LLC v. John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01266
Plaintiff:
New Residential Borrower 2022-SFR2, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe and Adrian Bateman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
3100 River Exchange LLC v. Akins et al
as 1:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
3100 River Exchange LLC doing business as Retreat at River Park Apartments
Defendant:
John Akins, Jayden Akins and And All Other Occupants
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SFRATL, c/o: Sylvan Homes, LLC v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
SFRATL, c/o: Sylvan Homes, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
SHV Homes 4 LLC v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv05648
Plaintiff:
SHV Homes 4 LLC
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Petitioner:
Charity Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
