Cases 1 - 10 of 586
JOHNSON v. BULLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
LAQUAN E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
K. BULLOCK, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACUNA-VIALES v. PASQUALE et al
as 3:2024cv01048
Plaintiff:
EDGAR ACUNA-VIALES
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PASQUALE, HOSPITAL ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON, SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CHARLES
as 2:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
MARK JOHNSON
Defendant:
WARDEN RON CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAY v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv00825
Petitioner:
MAURICE GAY
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS, MAJOR C. SEARS, MS. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. MCKENZIE et al
as 2:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
SCOTT MCKENZIE and THE MACKENZIE FAMILY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. GALKIN et al
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
MR. SETH GALKIN, ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. RIAZ et al
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
AY RIAZ, MENDEZ, N60 JA P.O. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
EARL SCOTT, GREGORY WILLIAMS and ZAIRE PALMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LAVELLE et al
as 2:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DETECTIVE LAVELLE, SERGEANT HOFFMAN, DALY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MARONE et al
as 2:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ISHMALE MARONE, CHASITY BEST, MARQUISE MANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
