Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Smith v. Veterans Administration et al
as 2:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
Dana Lydell Smith
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, FNU Penn, FNU Jepsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Hogan et al
as 2:2008cv01003
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tucker
Defendant:
L. Doug Hogan and Gary K. Searle
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCrary v. Turley et al
as 2:2008cv00600
Petitioner:
Eugene K. McCrary
Respondent:
Steven Turley, Curtis L. Garner, Jesse Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Moore v. Turley et al
as 2:2007cv00979
Plaintiff:
Willie Casanova Moore
Defendant:
Steven Turley and K. Galetka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruston v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2007cv00929
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Gordon B. Hinckley, Victor James Ruston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bigelow v. State of Utah
as 2:2007cv00839
Petitioner:
Irving K. Bigelow
Respondent:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leyland v. USA
as 2:2007cv00680
Petitioner:
Ty K. Leyland
Respondent:
USA, USA and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hittle v. Ackerson et al
as 2:2007cv00202
Plaintiff:
David R. Hittle
Defendant:
FNU Ackerson, Centerville Police Dept, City of Centerville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruston v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 2:2006cv00526
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Gordon B. Hinckley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
