Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Karp v. Beneficial Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03381
Defendant:
Beneficial Bancorp, Inc., Elizabeth H. Gemmill, Gerard P. Cuddy and others
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Karp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Karp v. First Connecticut Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02496
Plaintiff:
Selwyn Karp
Defendant:
John A. Green, Michael A. Ziebka, James T. Healey and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Bourdelais v. St. Mary's County Sheriffs et al
as 8:2018cv01684
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bourdelais
Defendant:
St. Mary's County Sheriffs and Karpinski, Colaresi and Karp, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company v. Karp et al
as 1:2017cv03341
Plaintiff:
Unitrin Auto and Home Insurance Company
Defendant:
Robert Karp, Chaya Karp and PennyMac Loan Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kimberlin v. Hunton & Williams LLP et al
as 8:2015cv00723
Plaintiff:
Brett Kimberlin
Defendant:
Hunton & Williams LLP, United States Chamber of Commerce, Palantir Technologies and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Bradley v. Perez et al
as 1:2007cv03199
Plaintiff:
Theresa Bradley
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez, Michael O'Malley, Smylie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yeibyo et al v. E-Park of DC, Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv01919
Plaintiff:
Woldegebriel Yeibyo, Woldegebriel Yeibyo, Solomon Abebe and others
Defendant:
E-Park of DC, Inc., E-Park of DC, Inc., Unipark Services Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Wesley, et al v. Mid Atlantic Medical, et al
as 8:1995cv02098
Plaintiff:
Suryabala B. Goswami , David Karp and Roy Wesley
Defendant:
Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. , Peter Leonard Flaherty , Eric Randolph Baugh and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Charles Rittenberg , Joseph J. Szlavik and Robert V. Bruchs Trust
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
