Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sidney Michael Lee et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01749
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Sidney Michael Lee, Marshall Earl Harris, Demetrius Lenard Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Walter Edward Hayden et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01746
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Walter Edward Hayden, John Lawrence Kemp, Gregory David Kaser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Kemp v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc
as 5:2022cv01560
Plaintiff:
Pamela Kemp
Defendant:
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Kemp v. Leigh Fibers Inc
as 7:2019cv01234
Defendant:
Leigh Fibers Inc
Plaintiff:
Bradford Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kemp v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv01295
Plaintiff:
Brenda S Kemp
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kemp v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2015cv00231
Plaintiff:
Betty Kemp
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kemp v. Harrah's Entertainment Inc et al
as 2:2008cv03887
Plaintiff:
Henry B Kemp, III
Defendant:
Harrah's Entertainment Inc, Harrah's Entertainment Inc, Casino Express LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Aiken v. Kemp et al
as 2:2007cv00413
Plaintiff:
Jelani Aiken
Defendant:
Maurice Kemp, Waffle House Inc and Waffle House Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kemp v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Kemp
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Norfolk Southern Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
