Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
LEAVITT v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2016cv00678
Plaintiff:
OWEN D. LEAVITT
Defendant:
BARACK H. OBAMA, LORETTA E. LYNCH and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGUE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER v. THOMPSON
as 1:2003cv00477
Plaintiff:
ROGUE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
PALMER v. HAMBURG et al
as 1:2009cv01375
Plaintiff:
KAREN PALMER
Defendant:
MARGARET HAMBURG, JOSHUA SHARFSTEIN, NORRIS ALDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
NDABA v. BUSH et al
as 1:2009cv00117
Plaintiff:
NDABA
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, KERRY WEEMS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HILLCREST RIVERSIDE, INC. v. LEAVITT
as 1:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
HILLCREST RIVERSIDE, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
COALITION FOR MERCURY FREE DRUGS et al v. LEAVITT et al
as 1:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
COALITION FOR MERCURY FREE DRUGS, LISA SYKES, MARK R. GEIER and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT and ANDREW C. VON ESCHENBACH
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION v. WEEMS et al
as 1:2008cv02204
Plaintiff:
BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
Defendant:
KERRY N. WEEMS and MICHAEL O. LEAVITT
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.