Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Gary v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
James L. Gary
Defendant:
USA, Kathy Hill, Dan Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Christy v. Marion USP
as 3:2022cv02044
Plaintiff:
Shawn Christy
Defendant:
Marion USP, Daniel Sproul, John LeClair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul, Nathan Simpkins, Gary Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Epps v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Carlos Epps
Defendant:
Warden Sproul, AW Sosa, AW LeClair and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vick v. USP Marion et al
as 3:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Delanio Maurice Vick
Defendant:
USP Marion, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Sproul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Demetrius N. Pitts
Defendant:
Dan Sproul, J. Leclair, C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pitts v. Hill et al
as 3:2022cv00055
Plaintiff:
Demetrius N. Pitts
Defendant:
Kathy Hill, Dan Sproul, J. Leclair and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pitts v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Demetrius N. Pitts and Abdur-Raheem
Defendant:
Dan Sproul, J. Leclair, Melissa Winn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pitts v. Bagwell et al
as 3:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius N. Pitts
Defendant:
M. Bagwell, E. Harbison, L. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Flournoy v. Sproul et al
as 3:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Michael Flournoy
Defendant:
Warden Sproul, C. Davis, Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
