Cases 1 - 10 of 965
Leahy v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65664
Plaintiff:
Lynn Leahy
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Black v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02455
Plaintiff:
Myron Lynn Black
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wesley v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65451
Plaintiff:
Lynn M Wesley
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Lynn E. Jones
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mills v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65363
Plaintiff:
Laura Lynn Mills
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Schultz v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Diana Lynn Schultz
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haines v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Randi Lynn Haines
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Lynn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
William Lynn
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
