Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MADRIGAL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv13854
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE MADRIGAL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADRIGAL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv12005
Plaintiff:
MANUEL MADRIGAL, JR. and THE ESTATE OF BRIGIDA MADRIGAL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADRIGAL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv11100
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
SYLVIA MADRIGAL
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADRIGAL v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv01587
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA MADRIGAL
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ULLOA v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv00571
Plaintiff:
MADRIGAL ULLOA
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADRIGAL v. ZUNIGA et al
as 1:2016cv09415
Plaintiff:
CELSO LAREDO MADRIGAL
Defendant:
LETICIA ZUNIGA, ESQ. and J. DAVID ALCANTRA, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDRADE et al v. PINI, INC.
as 2:2008cv04788
Plaintiff:
EUSTORGIO ANDRADE, RUBY ANDRADE and JORGE MADRIGAL
Defendant:
PINI, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
