Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
JENKINS v. MORTON COUNTY KANSAS et al
as 1:2017cv02379
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAY JENKINS
Defendant:
MORTON COUNTY KANSAS and SEWARD COUNTY KANSAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEMON v. KRAMER et al
as 1:2016cv02025
Plaintiff:
ARRON FREDERICK LEMON
Defendant:
MARY MORTON KRAMER , TIMOTHY JOHN MCCRONE , LENORE ROSALIE GELFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CANNADY v. STATE OF MISSOURI et al
as 1:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
VINCENT CANNADY
Defendant:
STATE OF MISSOURI, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI BOARD OF CURATORS, UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe v. Donald Rumsfeld, et al
as 12-5400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Doe
Defendant - Appellee:
Leon E. Panetta, United States Secretary of Defense, Janet Ann Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, Robert S. Mueller, III, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-5012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MORTON et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2008cv01022
Plaintiff:
LADESHA MORTON, D. G., L. G. and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, MICHAEL KELLY and LORRY BONDS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-5037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
