Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Bryan v. Defense Technology U.S. et al
as 3:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
T. Terell Bryan
Defendant:
Defense Technology U.S., U.S. Attorney , Penny Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Day et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00305
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Day , Leonard Haslag , James McCormick and others
Defendant:
Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., Paul C. Orberson, Jeff Orberson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Morton v. Crews
as 5:2010cv00148
Petitioner:
Alphonzo R. Morton
Respondent:
Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morton v. Crews
as 3:2010cv00195
Petitioner:
Alphonzo R. Morton
Respondent:
Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Hiland et al
as 5:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Jazz Adams
Defendant:
China Hiland, Jasis Bryon, Tom Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohen v. Holder et al
as 5:2010cv00012
Plaintiff:
L. C. Cohen
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., John Morton, Harley G. Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Casada v. SSA
as 6:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
Morton Latine Casada
Defendant:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Steelcase Inc. v. Morton Custom Plastics, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00548
Plaintiff:
Steelcase Inc.
Defendant:
Morton Custom Plastics, Inc. and Wilbert Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morton v. Osborne, et al
as 4:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Victor Carl Morton
Defendant:
David Osborne, Daviess County Detention Center and Southern Health Partners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morton v. Osborne
as 4:2008cv00051
Plaintiff:
Victor Carl Morton
Defendant:
David Osborne
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
