Cases 11 - 20 of 71
NORIEGA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv25136
Plaintiff:
BOBBY NORIEGA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NORIEGA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17049
Plaintiff:
GAETANO NORIEGA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NORIEGA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11758
Plaintiff:
RICARDO NORIEGA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maria Montefu Acosta v. Miami-Dade County, et al
as 22-11675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIA DEL CARMEN MONTEFU ACOSTA, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maykel Antonio Barrera, deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, LAWENCE BALLERSTEROS, JORGE FERRER and others
Acevedo v. City of Miami et al
as 1:2022cv20224
Plaintiff:
Hubert Arturo Acevedo
Defendant:
City of Miami, Joe Carollo, Alex Diaz de la Portilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NORIEGA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04894
Plaintiff:
IAN NORIEGA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FROBENIUS v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2021cv04198
Plaintiff:
JOHN FROBENIUS, TERRY GERMANY, RONALD GILCHRIST and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Noriega v. Westminster St. Augustine
as 3:2021cv01014
Plaintiff:
EDWIN NORIEGA
Defendant:
WESTMINSTER ST. AUGUSTINE and Westminster Pines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
NORIEGA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv49217
Plaintiff:
ABLE NORIEGA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NORIEGA v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 1:2021cv20578
Plaintiff:
MIDIALA NORIEGA
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
