Cases 1 - 10 of 42
J.S.S. v. Northern Oregon Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
J. S. S.
Defendant:
Northern Oregon Corrections and Josue Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J.B. v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
J.B.
Defendant:
Levi Gray, Jayson Leak, Paul Kizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01926
Petitioner:
Hector Diaz Perez
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McClintock Perez v. Jail Staff Employees et al
as 3:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
Carmen Elsa McClintock Percy and Carmen Elsa McClintock Perez
Defendant:
Jail Staff Employees, Jail Commander and Sheriff Mark Garton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jimaal Robinson
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Abraham Campos, Kevin Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Roberts et al
as 6:2022cv01868
Plaintiff:
Ernie Perez
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Koltes, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Capps et al
as 2:2022cv01047
Plaintiff:
Ernie Perez
Defendant:
Joe Capps, J. Miller, J. Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00997
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00430
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Perez v. Rau
as 2:2021cv01025
Plaintiff:
Manuel Perez
Defendant:
Nyssa P.D. and Ray Rau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
