Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Catamount Properties 2018, LLC v. Richards
as 4:2022cv00267
Defendant:
Eric Richards and Eric Randolph
Plaintiff:
Catamount Properties 2018, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Randolph v. Stephens et al
as 4:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Eric Randolph
Defendant:
Igor Stephens, Peter Lublin, Gregory Geiser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amberlake Village LLC v. Randolph
as 1:2019cv05222
Plaintiff:
Amberlake Village LLC
Defendant:
Alycia Randolph
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Riverdale Clayton LLC et al v. Randolph
as 1:2019cv04571
Plaintiff:
Riverdale Clayton LLC, CSS Services, Inc. and Harmony Pines
Defendant:
Tammy Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA USA v. BUTTS COUNTY GEORGIA, et al
as 5:2018cv00471
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, RANDOLPH COUNTY GEORGIA, SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
COOSA NATION OF NORTH AMERICA USA, DR MONIQUE Y TATE, LAMAR PERRYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Matrix Residential v. Osborne
as 1:2018cv04928
Plaintiff:
Matrix Residential
Defendant:
Terrell Osborne
Petitioner:
Tammy Randolph
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
South Atlanta Portfolio LLC v. Randolph
as 1:2018cv00702
Plaintiff:
South Atlanta Portfolio LLC , Mountain View Apts. and CSS Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Tammy Randolph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
South Atlanta Portfolio LLC et al v. Randolph
as 1:2017cv04438
Plaintiff:
South Atlanta Portfolio LLC, Meadow View Apts. and CSS Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Tammy Randolph
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
South Atlanta Portfolio LLC v. Randolph
as 1:2017cv03748
Plaintiff:
South Atlanta Portfolio LLC
Defendant:
Tammy Randolph
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
South Atlanta Portfolio LLC v. Randolph
as 1:2017cv03538
Plaintiff:
South Atlanta Portfolio LLC
Defendant:
Tammy Randolph
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
