Cases 1 - 10 of 149
Lyralisa Stevens v. Robinson
as 23-15894
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBINSON, Sergeant
Jose Moreno v. Jim Robinson
as 23-15453
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE MORENO
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM ROBINSON
Hugh Robinson v. Acting Warden
as 23-55105
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUGH ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
ACTING WARDEN
Jonathan Rivera v. Centurion, et al
as 22-16818
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ERIC RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTURION, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as P.C.S.D. Medical Intake Jane Doe #1, PIMA COUNTY ADULT DETENTION COMPLEX and others
Ronald Robinson v. General Manager of CALPIA, et al
as 22-56103
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD G. ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERAL MANAGER OF CALPIA, individual ; and official capacity, J. GASTELO, Warden: individual ; and official capacity, FRANK SHAW, Administrator of CALPIA at California Men's Colony, individual; and official capacity and others
Todd Robben v. Jim Robinson
as 22-16651
Petitioner / Appellant:
TODD CHRISTIAN ROBBEN
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM ROBINSON
Ruben Martinez v. D. Gongora, et al
as 22-16601
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBEN FEBRONIO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
D. GONGORA, J. ROBINSON, IBARRA, Ms. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
M. CASTAGNOLA
Nicholas Stone v. T. Robinson, et al
as 22-16587
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS SCOTT STONE
Defendant / Appellee:
T. ROBINSON, Y. YANG, LVN, R. DAVID and others
Aaron Eaton v. Eynon, et al
as 22-35749
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON DALE EATON
Defendant / Appellee:
EYNON, Two Rivers Correctional Institution Grievance coordinator, ROSSI, Two Rivers Correctional Institution Grievance coordinator, STARK, Two Rivers Correctional Institution Physical Plant Manager and others
Johnathan Harper v. David Robinson, et al
as 22-16450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN SETH HARPER
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, DAVID PUTNAM, CRYSTAL THOMAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
