Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Salas (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Petitioner:
German Salas
Respondent:
Moses Stancil, Barry Goodrich and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Eaves (PS) v. Cox et al
as 1:2023cv01625
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Larry Cox, Roscoe Mueller, Jessica Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaves v. Skramsted et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Rodney Douglas Eaves
Defendant:
Skramsted, Vanessa Carson, Kory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yakas et al v. Roark et al
as 1:2021cv01210
Defendant:
Alison Morgan, CoreCivic, Inc., Joel Hart and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Pritchard and Joshua Yakas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilhelm v. Tengasco, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00348
Defendant:
Peter E. Salas, Matthew K. Behrent, Richard M. Thon and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Yakas et al v. Roark et al
as 1:2020cv03818
Defendant:
Alison Morgan, Mo, Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Pritchard and Joshua Yakas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferrell v. Modlin et al
as 1:2020cv03138
Defendant:
Leo Salas, Molly Gavinski and Austin Modlin
Plaintiff:
Dennis J. Ferrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salas v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv02975
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Alma L. Salas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
