Cases 1 - 10 of 844
Santo v. Aerostar Training Services, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv01283
Defendant:
Aerostar Management Services, LLC, Aerostar Training Services, LLC and Deidra Wilson
Plaintiff:
David Santo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv23387
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Silva v. Gimenez Santos
as 6:2024cv01592
Respondent:
Bruna Guedes Gimenez Santos
Petitioner:
Raphael Santos Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Santos v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
as 6:2024cv01571
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,
Plaintiff:
ISAYRA SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SANTOS v. Equifax
as 6:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
ISAYRA SANTOS
Defendant:
Equifax
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SANTOS v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,
as 6:2024cv01564
Defendant:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,
Plaintiff:
ISAYRA SANTOS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Silva v. Gimenez
as 6:2024cv01524
Petitioner:
Raphael Santos Silva
Claimant:
GARY S. ISRAEL
Respondent:
Runa Guedes Gimenez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00298
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Batista Martinez v. Perez Bryant et al
as 6:2024cv01033
Defendant:
CH2 Logistics, LLC and Artavia Perez Bryant
Plaintiff:
Juan Batista Martinez
Pretrial Service:
F. Robert Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
