Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Carroll v. United States of America
as 23-1165
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Carroll
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, on behalf of the Department of Veterans Affairs at the Stratton Veterans Hospital, Albany, NY
Baldwin v. United States of America/Stratton Veterans Administration Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Joseph Francis Baldwin
Defendant:
United States of America/Stratton Veterans Administration Medical Center, Jerome Hill, M.D. and James Dolph, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carroll v. United States of America
as 20-3323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Carroll
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, on behalf of the Department of Veterans Affairs at the Stratton Veterans Hospital, Albany, NY
Woodard v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv01097
Plaintiff:
Crystal J. Woodard
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Veterans Affairs and Albany Stratton Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ross v. United States of America et al
as 1:2015cv01094
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Ross
Defendant:
United States of America, Albany Stratton VA Medical Center, Marisa Orgera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stratton v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv09042
Plaintiff:
Heather Stratton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Butez et al v. United States of America et al
as 6:2014cv00922
Plaintiff:
Ronald A. Butez and Anna L. Butez
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Deparment of Veterans Affairs, Albany Stratton Veterans Affairs Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Canty v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv01363
Plaintiff:
Freddie Canty
Defendant:
United States of America and Samuel S. Stratton VA Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
