Cases 11 - 20 of 1,033
Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan, et al
as 23-13685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY DOLAN, TIMOTHY BROGLIO and US CONFERENCE OF CATHOLIC BISHOPS
Sharp v. Broglio et al
as 8:2023cv02508
Plaintiff:
Daryl Sharp
Defendant:
Timothy Broglio and Timothy Dolan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Daryl Sharp v. Timothy Dolan
as 23-13596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYL SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY DOLAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Sharp v. Dolan et al
as 8:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Daryl Sharp
Defendant:
Timothy Dolan, Archbishop Timothy Broglio and U.S. Conference Catholic Bishop
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SHARPE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv29674
Plaintiff:
JAMES SHARPE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33734
Plaintiff:
BRENT SHARP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHARP v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31096
Plaintiff:
JASON SHARP
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHARPE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25274
Plaintiff:
TALON SHARPE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
