Cases 1 - 10 of 1,114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06660
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pannun v. The Government of India et al
as 1:2024cv07021
Defendant:
Samant Goel, The Government of India, Vikram Yadav and others
Plaintiff:
Gurpatwant Singh Pannun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv06843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mendoza v. Verizon et al
as 2:2024cv05945
Defendant:
IESHPAL SINGH, Verizon Wireless LLC, N.Y. CONNECTION, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Chipman et al v. The City of New York
as 1:2024cv05839
Plaintiff:
Richard Chipman, Mohammad Akram, Asare Bekoe and others
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05686
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05862
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
