Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,265
SEWELL-SMITH v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv01239
Plaintiff: NICKA SEWELL-SMITH
Defendant: NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Michaela Smith v. Howard University
as 24-7063
Plaintiff: Michaela Smith
Defendant: Howard University
DIEGELMANN et al v. YELLIN et al
as 1:2024cv01090
Plaintiff: AXEL DIEGELMANN, FRITZ DIEGELMANN, RHEINGOLD EDELMETALL AG and others
Defendant: JANET YELLIN, BRADLEY SMITH, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00935
Plaintiff: SHANNON MEDICAL CENTER, DCH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, SONOMA VALLEY HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ROSEMOND v. WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00927
Plaintiff: GARRY ROSEMOND
Defendant: PAMELA B. WASHINGTON and KIMBERLY SMITH
SMITH v. UNITED STATES TREASURY et al
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff: KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant: UNITED STATES TREASURY, BANK OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00696
Not Yet Classified: JANET YELLEN, TREASURY DEPARTMENT, BRADLEY T. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
ASTANIN v. YELLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00697
Plaintiff: EDDIE VLADIMIROVICH ASTANIN
Defendant: JANET YELLEN, TREASURY DEPARTMENT, BRADLEY T. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?