Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Solis et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2023cv03804
Plaintiff:
Nimia Solis and Orlando Enrique Solis
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SOLIS DE JESUS et al v. EASTERN REVENUE, INC.
as 2:2018cv05280
Defendant:
EASTERN REVENUE, INC.
Plaintiff:
GREGORY MEA and ISAMAR L. SOLIS DE JESUS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SOLIS v. 1100 AVENEL BOULEVARD, LP et al
as 2:2017cv02638
Plaintiff:
ABIGAIL SOLIS
Defendant:
1100 AVENEL BOULEVARD, LP and SENTINEL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ESPINAL et al v. DILLARD et al
as 5:2017cv00346
Defendant:
DILLARD, ROBERT DILLARD and INTERSTATE FURNITURE LOGISTICS
Plaintiff:
ESPINAL, RITA M. ESPINAL, NEOPOLO SOLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SOLIS v. RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06771
Plaintiff:
GABINO HIDALGO SOLIS
Defendant:
RYOBI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , THE HOME DEPOT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SIMMONS v. SIMPSON HOUSE, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06636
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMMONS
Defendant:
SIMPSON HOUSE, INC. , SIMPSON HOUSE FOUNDATION , SOLIS HEALTHCARE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REESE et al v. POOK & POOK, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv05715
Plaintiff:
CARTER P. REESE and SARAH REESE
Defendant:
POOK & POOK, LLC, RON POOK, DEBRA POOK and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
