Cases 1 - 10 of 953
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Bobby Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Stewart v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03656
Plaintiff:
Morris Stewart
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security Of The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cruz v. Board of Elections in the City of New Yok et al
as 1:2024cv03153
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Cruz
Defendant:
Board of Elections in the City of New Yok, The City of New York, Karen Koslowithzz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Winsome Doreen Stewart
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stewart v. Tapestry, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02988
Plaintiff:
Michael Stewart
Defendant:
Tapestry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Miller v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02711
Plaintiff:
Eric Miller
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd P. Headley and others
Lella et al v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Vito Lella and Alex Xenidis
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James Foster, Todd Headley and others
O'Neil v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02457
Plaintiff:
Paul O'Neil
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd Headley and others
Stover et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2024cv02340
Plaintiff:
Collin Stover and Dana Stewart
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
