Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Valle v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01000
Plaintiff:
Martin Valle
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Actavis, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz v. USA
as 3:2014cv01162
Petitioner:
Oscar Valle Ortiz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Bergner et al v. Windy City Meter Shop, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv08113
Plaintiff:
Melissa Bergner , Raymond Valle , Elvis Rosario and others
Defendant:
Windy City Meter Shop, LLC, Total Taxi Repair & Body Shop, LLC, Dispatch Taxi Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Valle v. Butler
as 1:2014cv04264
Petitioner:
Ernesto Valle
Respondent:
Kim Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valle v. Insure On The Spot Services et al
as 1:2014cv02075
Plaintiff:
Angelita Valle
Defendant:
Insure On The Spot Services, Michael G. Kariotis, Betty Abbate and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SprintCom Inc et al v. Scott et al
as 1:2013cv06565
Plaintiff:
SprintCom Inc , WirelessCo, L.P. , NPCR, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Doug Scott , John T. Colgan , Ann McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cbeyond Communications, LLC v. Scott et al
as 1:2013cv03731
Plaintiff:
Cbeyond Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Doug Scott , John T. Colgan , Ann McCabe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02343
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Valle v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv01078
Plaintiff:
Antonio Valle
Defendant:
. Godinez, . Akapore, . McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Valle v. Law Offices of Gil & Cruz et al
as 1:2013cv01110
Plaintiff:
Jaime L. Valle
Defendant:
Law Offices of Gil & Cruz and Rene Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
