Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023vv01890
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Darby Development Company, Inc. v. US
as 22-1929
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., GWR MANAGEMENT, LLC, MCLEAN INVESTMENTS, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Acadiana Management Group, LLC v. US
as 21-1941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LTAC OF LOUISIANA, LLC, CENTRAL INDIANA-AMG SPECIALTY HOSPITAL, LLC, HOUMA-AMG SPECIALTY HOSPITAL, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Donald v. US
as 21-1198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BONNIE MEEDER, DANIEL MCCARTHY, CHAN YI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Rojas-Vega v. US
as 19-1475
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANY ROJAS-VEGA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
VEGA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2012vv00164
Petitioner:
AMERLINDIA SANCHEZ VEGA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
VEGA et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00177
Petitioner:
DINA VEGA , JOSE LUIS PEREZ and ANGEL PEREZ VEGA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
CLARK et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv00761
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J. CLARK , DARIEN D. SHELTON and TINA M. VEGA
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
AIA ENGINEERING V MAGOTTEAUX INTL
as 11-1058
Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee:
AIA Engineering Limited
Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant:
Magotteaux International S/A and Magotteaux, Inc.
Third Party Defendant-Appellee:
Vega Industries, Ltd., Inc.
VEGA v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00634
Petitioner:
MOISES VEGA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
