Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Thomas
as 24-726
Defendant:
NEGUS THOMAS, JERKENO WALLACE, LAVAR JACKSON and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 24-196
Defendant:
NEGUS THOMAS, LAVAR JACKSON, KAVOHN TAYLOR and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JERKENO WALLACE and Uptown
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2021cv02786
Plaintiff:
DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO, Cynthia MATSUMOTO and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
ALTSCHULD et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2021cv02779
Plaintiff:
DAN ET AL ALTSCHULD, DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO and others
Not Classified By Court:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Defendant:
Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO and GINA M. RAIMONDO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
United States of America v. Thomas
as 17-1190
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Negus Thomas, AKA Brown Eyes, AKA B.E. and Jerkeno Wallace, AKA Uptown
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 17-1196
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jerkeno Wallace, AKA Uptown
United States of America v. Thomas (Thomas)
as 14-1980
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Negus Thomas, AKA Brown Eyes, AKA B.E.
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 14-1728
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jerkeno Wallace, AKA Uptown and Negus Thomas, AKA Brown Eyes, AKA B.E.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
