Cases 1 - 7 of 7
AUDREY YEUNG v. AMAZON.COM, INC et al
as 1:2020cv15579
Plaintiff:
WESCO INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o AUDREY YEUNG and AUDREY YOUNG
Defendant:
AMAZON .COM, INC, ABC CORP (1-20) and AMAZON.COM INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Mendoza et al v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 1:2020cv01133
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products Inc, Sharp Manufacturing Company of America, a Division of Sharp Electronics Corporation, Midea Microwave and Electrical Appliances Manufacturing Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
James Hunt and Erika Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIBERTY STONE & AGGREGATES-CLINTON QUARRY, LLC v. PENN JERSEY MACHINERY, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv09911
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10, JOHN DOES 1-10, PENN JERSEY MACHINERY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY STONE & AGGREGATES-CLINTON QUARRY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ACE INA INSURANCE v. PREFERRED FREEZER SERVICES OF NEWARK,LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02542
Defendant:
PREFERRED FREEZER SERVICES OF NEWARK, LLC, CMA-CGM (America), LLC, M/V APL MALASYA V.LB759E and others
Plaintiff:
ACE INA INSURANCE
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
FAOUR v. HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA), INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05598
Defendant:
HAPAG-LLOYD (AMERICA), INC. , HAPAG-LLOYD AG , TRANSWORLD LOGISTICS GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SAMI FAOUR
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81
ESTATE OF TOMMASO POPOLIZIO et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv01532
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF TOMMASO POPOLIZIO, CIANA POPOLOZIO and ALEXIA POPOLIZO
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, PRO GUARD, INC., ABC CORP. MANUFACTURER OF POLICE VEHICLE 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
JATCZYSZYN v. MARCAL PAPER MILLS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv05792
Plaintiff:
TADEUSZ JATCZYSZYN
Defendant:
MARCAL PAPER MILLS, INC., GENIE, TEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
