Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
WILLIAMS v. WARD
as 5:2022cv00275
Petitioner: GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR and ABDUL MALIK BEY
Respondent: WARDEN TIMOTHY C WARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00156
Plaintiff: GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR and ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant: PUBLIC OFFICIAL LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON, TIMOTHY C WARD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00439
Plaintiff: GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR and ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WHITTINGTON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00305
Plaintiff: GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR and ABDUL MALIK BEY
Defendant: PUBLIC OFFICIAL LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00061
Plaintiff: ABDUL MALIK BEY and GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00041
Petitioner: GRADY RENARD WILLIAMS, JR and ABDUL MALIK BEY
Respondent: TIMOTHY C WARD and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdul Bey v. Georgia Department of Corr., et al
as 19-13292
Defendant / Appellee: TIMOTHY WARD, COMMISSIONER, JAMES D. SMITH, Georgia Department of Corrections, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ABDUL MALIK BEY
BEY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00238
Defendant: INVESTIGATOR JAMES D SMITH, SERGEANT WHITEHEAD, WARDEN KEVIN SPRAYBERRY and others
Plaintiff: ABDUL MALIK BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?