Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Mayo v. Howell et al
as 1:2022cv05001
Plaintiff:
Robert Mayo
Defendant:
Marion Howell and ArcBest doing business as ABF Freight System Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Kleine v. ABF Freight System, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Brenda Kleine
Defendant:
ABF Freight System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hill-Gelin et al v. ABF Freight System, Inc.
as 9:2021cv81543
Plaintiff:
Donna Hill-Gelin, Jordan Johnson, by and through his mother and natural guardian, Arlene Philmore and Arlene Philmore
Defendant:
ABF Freight System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mayo v. Howell et al
as 1:2021cv02483
Plaintiff:
Robert Mayo
Defendant:
Marion Howell and Arcbest doing business as ABF Freight System Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Keitt v. Lankford et al
as 1:2021cv00344
Defendant:
ABF Freight System, Inc., Barry Keith Lankford and Arcbest II, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Byron Keitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kellam v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00252
Defendant:
Michael Lee Martin and ABF Freight Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kellam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kellam v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00961
Defendant:
Michael Lee Martin and ABF Freight Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kellam
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Martinez v. ABF Freight Systems, Inc. et al
as 9:2019cv80110
Plaintiff:
David Martinez
Defendant:
Bart Thompson, Robert Faircloth, John Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
