Cases 21 - 30 of 13,513
In Re: Asbestos Prod Liability, et al
as 13-3219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD HELD
Defendant - Appellee:
ACANDS INC, AIRCO INC THE BOC GROUP, AW CHESTERTON CO and others
FUNG et al v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv62738
Defendant:
DELAVAL STEAM TURBINE CO, KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC, PLANT INSULATION CO. and others
Plaintiff:
JERRY FUNG and LISA FUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2012cv30028
Plaintiff:
JAMES THOMAS, JR. , SANTAMARIE THOMAS , LEONARD THOMAS and others
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
In Re: Asbestos Products Liabi, et al
as 12-3824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER J. SPECHT
Defendant - Appellee:
ACANDS INC, AP GREEN IND INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD IND and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
In Re: Asbestos Products Liabi, et al
as 12-3822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD W. LANDES
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BEVERLY J. LANDES
Defendant - Appellee:
ANACONDA COMPANY, A P GREEN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, ACANDS INC and others
URAM v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv62742
Defendant:
KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC, PLANT INSULATION CO., CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRONWORKS and others
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA A. URAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TABONE v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2012cv30027
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J TABONE
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
YANCEY v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2012cv30026
Plaintiff:
CHARLES O YANCEY
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEWIS v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2012cv30025
Plaintiff:
GIDEON G LEWIS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CAIN v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2012cv30024
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN N CAIN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
