Cases 11 - 19 of 19
FURLOW v. ORLANDO FLORIDAS SOCIAL SECURITY ADM
as 4:2013cv00488
Plaintiff:
ELGINE WILSON FURLOW
Defendant:
ORLANDO FLORIDAS SOCIAL SECURITY ADM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adme v. El Dorado Towers Condominium Association, Inc.
as 1:2012cv23317
Plaintiff:
Jean Marie Adme
Defendant:
El Dorado Towers Condominium Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Paillardon v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company et al
as 1:2012cv22693
Petitioner:
Regis Paillardon
Respondent:
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and ADM Latin America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Sanchez v. Commissioner of Social Security Adm.
as 1:2012cv21790
Plaintiff:
Ana E. Sanchez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Adm.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv20347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gulf Coast Bank And Trust Company v. The Carribbean Sparkle et al
as 0:2009cv60542
Plaintiff:
Gulf Coast Bank And Trust Company and Gulf Coast Bank And Trust Company
Defendant:
The Carribbean Sparkle, Adme Equipment Leasing, LLC and Earl E Weber, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
RHETT v. FIREMANS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al
as 1:2009cv00064
Plaintiff:
ERIC J RHETT
Defendant:
FIREMANS INSURANCE COMPANY, HCCSE UNIT, PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS CO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Matthews v. United States Navy et al
as 3:2008cv00996
Plaintiff:
Eric Martin Matthews
Defendant:
United States Navy, ADM Nathman, Commanding Officer and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Microsoft Corporation v. Cietdirect.com LLC et al
as 0:2008cv60668
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Corporation and others
Defendant:
Cietdirect.com LLC, ADM Managing Inc., Aaron Markizer and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
