Cases 1 - 10 of 12
AFGE Local 501 v. Merrick Garland, as Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv20474
Plaintiff:
AFGE Local 501
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice and Merrick Garland, as Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23826
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Phillip v. American Federation Government Employees AFL-CIO et al
as 1:2019cv20122
Defendant:
American Federation Government Employees AFL-CIO and AFGE Local Union 3690
Plaintiff:
Lionel Phillip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv24099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv23671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Latin Bakery Inc et al
as 1:2011cv22199
Plaintiff:
Philip Morris USA Inc.
Defendant:
Palmar Cafeteria Inc, Clara Martinez, Woodland Investments Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
United States Department of Labor v. Government Employees AFGE AFL-CIO Local 3168 USDA
as 0:2010cv62455
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Government Employees AFGE AFL-CIO Local Union 3158 USDA and Roberto Mendeola
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv01406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
