Cases 11 - 17 of 17
RAYMOND'S GLASS, INC v. ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED et al
as 2:2008cv00257
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND'S GLASS, INC
Defendant:
ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED, AGC FLAT GLASS, AGC FLAT GLASS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PUBLIC SUPPLY COMPANY v. ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED et al
as 2:2008cv00240
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC SUPPLY COMPANY
Defendant:
ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED, AGC FLAT GLASS, AGC FLAT GLASS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
WALLY'S GLASS SERVICE, INC. v. GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP. et al
as 2:2008cv00730
Plaintiff:
WALLY'S GLASS SERVICE, INC.
Defendant:
GUARDIAN INDUSTRIES CORP., GUARDIAN FABRICATION INC., GUARDIAN WALLED LAKE FABRICATION CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
E & G AUTO PARTS, INC. v. ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED et al
as 2:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
E & G AUTO PARTS, INC.
Defendant:
ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED, AGC FLAT GLASS, AGC FLAT GLASS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SUPERIOR GLASS, INC v. ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED et al
as 2:2008cv00198
Plaintiff:
SUPERIOR GLASS, INC
Defendant:
ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED, AGC FLAT GLASS, AGC FLAT GLASS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
D & S GLASS SERVICES, INC. v. ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED et al
as 2:2008cv00179
Plaintiff:
D & S GLASS SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED, AGC FLAT GLASS, AGC FLAT GLASS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
MARAN-WURZELL GLASS & MIRROR v. ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED et al
as 2:2008cv00175
Plaintiff:
MARAN-WURZELL GLASS & MIRROR
Defendant:
ASAHI GLASS COMPANY LIMITED, AGC FLAT GLASS, AGC FLAT GLASS NORTH AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
