Cases 1 - 10 of 244
Ahmad et al v. US Citizenship and Immigration Services
as 2:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Irshad Ahmad, Muhammad Tahir Ahmad, Khalid Javed and others
Defendant:
US Citizenship and Immigration Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Tounisi v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Abdella Ahmad Tounisi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheikh v. Chaudry et al
as 1:2024cv00658
Plaintiff:
Zafar Sheikh
Defendant:
Bashir Chaudry, Bushra Naseer, Ambreen Qadir and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hafiz Jafar Ahmad v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-2923
Petitioner:
HAFIZ NUR AHMAD BIN JAFAR AHMAD
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Taha v. Trojan et al
as 1:2023cv13849
Plaintiff:
Azme Taha
Defendant:
Richard Trojan, Ahmad M. Alkhatib, Ilhab Naserallah and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Nasserallah et al v Trojan
as 1:2023cv13848
Defendant:
Richard Trojan
Plaintiff:
Ilhab Nasserallah and Ahmad M. Alkhatib
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
