Cases 1 - 10 of 12
HALL v. SHEPARD et al
as 5:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
ALAN RICHARD HALL
Defendant:
RICK SHEPARD, BRIAN ADAMS, WARDEN MORALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMAS HARRISON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRACY JEFFERSON, AHMED HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN et al v. HOLT et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Judge BEVERLY B MARTIN, Khalid Mouton and BEVERLY B MARTIN
Defendant:
PO AHMED HOLT, ROBERT TOOLE, STAN SHEPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VASS v. WHITTINGHAM et al
as 5:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AARON VASS and CALVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGHAM, COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, ANN BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAMOND v. WARD et al
as 5:2020cv00453
Defendant:
JACK SAULS, ARETHA SMITH, RODNEY JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY DIAMOND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. Ward et al
as 1:2020cv04764
Defendant:
Jack Sauls, Aretha Smith, Rodney Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley Diamond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Ward et al
as 4:2020cv00252
Defendant:
Matthew Kenndy, Kim Stewart, Jack Koon and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Holt et al
as 1:2017cv05508
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Evans
Defendant:
Ahmed Holt and Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Holt et al
as 1:2017cv00465
Plaintiff:
Alvin Adams, III
Defendant:
Ahmed Holt, Sampson, V. Brewton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
