Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Marquice Robinson v. AKAL Security, Inc., et al
as 20-12143
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, THE UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, by and through Jeff Sessions, U.S. Attorney General and AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUICE D. ROBINSON
Marquice Robinson v. AKAL Security, Inc., et al
as 20-11574
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, by and through Jeff Sessions, U. S. Attorney General and AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUICE ROBINSON and MARQUICE D. ROBINSON
Dean v. Akal Security Inc
as 1:2018mc00033
Defendant:
Akal Security Inc
Plaintiff:
Howard Dean
Petitioner:
Bracewell L L C
DEAN v. AKAL SECURITY INC.
as 1:2018mc00106
Defendant:
AKAL SECURITY INC.
Plaintiff:
HOWARD DEAN
Respondent:
BRACEWELL, LLC and BRACEWELL & GUILIANI LLP
Dean v. Akal Security Inc
as 1:2018mc00020
Plaintiff:
Hayward Dean
Defendant:
Akal Security Inc
Movant:
Bracewell L L P
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
DEAN v. AKAL SECURITY, INC.
as 1:2018mc00060
Plaintiff:
HAYWARD DEAN
Defendant:
AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash Subpoenas
Ronnie Hogue v. Coastal International, Inc., et al
as 17-7094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronnie C. Hogue
Defendant - Appellee:
Coastal International, Inc. and Akal Security, Inc.
Galarza et al v. Akal Security, Inc.
as 8:2013mc00056
Plaintiff:
Louis Galarza and Oscar Machicote
Defendant:
Akal Security, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. v. BOHR et al
as 1:2012mc00151
Petitioner:
INTER-CON SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. BOHR, LOIS B. EPPS, JAMES M. CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Enforce Subpoena
Akal Security, Inc. v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 3:2009cv02277
Plaintiff:
Akal Security, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
