Cases 1 - 10 of 164
Kocsor v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv24356
Plaintiff:
Zsolt Kocsor
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Customs and Border Protection Officer Frank Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02770
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv23151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marquice Robinson v. AKAL Security, Inc., et al
as 20-12143
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, THE UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, by and through Jeff Sessions, U.S. Attorney General and AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUICE D. ROBINSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01435
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marquice Robinson v. AKAL Security, Inc., et al
as 20-11574
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HOLMAN, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, by and through Jeff Sessions, U. S. Attorney General and AKAL SECURITY, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUICE ROBINSON and MARQUICE D. ROBINSON
v. Akal Security, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00231
Defendant:
Akal Security, Inc. and Metropolitan Security Services, Inc. d/b/a Walden Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vachon v. Akal Security, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv00233
Defendant:
Akal Security, Inc., Metropolitan Security Services, Inc. d/b/a Walden Security and Metropolitan Security Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Darryl Vachon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
