Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Bagnall v. Becerra
as 20-1642
Intervenor:
Jessie Ruschmann, Representitive of the Estate of Frederick Ruschmann, Louis Dziadzia, Loretta Jackson and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Lee Barrows, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, George Renshaw, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Mary Smith, Representative of the Estate of Martha Leyanna and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Bagnall, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated and Sarah Mulcahy, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Appellee:
Brenda Hardy, Executrix of the Estate of Loretta Jackson and Michael Holt, Executor of the Estate of Charles Holt
Defendant / Appellant:
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Norris Cochran, Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
AARP, AARP Foundation, National Disability Rights Network and others
Children's Health Care, et al v. Centers for Medicare, et al
as 17-2896
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Children's Health Care, doing business as Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota and Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
Defendant - Appellant:
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Seema Verma, Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in her official capacity and Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity
Children's Health Care, et al v. Centers for Medicare, et al
as 17-2896
Defendant / Appellant:
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and Seema Verma, Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, in her official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Children's Health Care, doing business as Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota and Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
