Cases 41 - 50 of 88
JOHNSON et al v. USA
as 1:2011cv00087
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JOHNSON, JR. , CHRISTOPHER PAUL JOHNSON , RON ALEXANDER JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
FALANA V KENT STATE UNIV
as 11-1198
Defendant-Appellant:
Alexander J. Seed and Kent State University
Plaintiff-Appellee:
Olusegun Falana
SHRIVER et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00713
Petitioner:
MIKE SHRIVER, LAURA SHRIVER and ALEXANDER J SHRIVER
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
WALDEN et al
as 1:2010cv00495
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY WALDEN, KURT V BRYANT, ALEXANDER WILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
WILCOX et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2010vv00268
Petitioner:
BLAKE WILCOX , LEAH WILCOX and ALEXANDER GREY WILCOX
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
OMURA V SHAFER
as 10-1357
Appellee:
Alexander Epple, Aurelian Dodoc, David Shafer and others
Appellant:
Yasuhiro Omura, Yasuhiro Omura, Yasuhiro Omura and others
SOTO et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2009vv00897
Petitioner:
SERGIO SOTO , VERONICA SOTO and ALEXANDER SOTO
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300
Type:
Other Statutes
ALEXANDER V DVA
as 10-7035
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
Michael Alexander, Michael Alexander, Michael Alexander and others
PUCILOWSKI V JUSTICE
as 09-3101
Petitioner:
Alexander F. Pucilowski, Jr.
Respondent:
Department of Justice
GARCIA-RIVERA V MSPB
as 09-3014
Petitioner:
Alexander Garcia-Rivera
Respondent:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Merit Systems Protection Board:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
