Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Acosta v. Stephens
as 2:2018cv00493
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Brandi Box Stephens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131
Acosta v. Slocumb Law Firm, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Slocumb Law Firm, LLC and Michael W. Slocumb
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
In Re: Inspection of the work establishment known as Peacock Timber Company, Inc. (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2017mc03805
Movant:
R. Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
Acosta v. Phone City Birmngham LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01776
Defendant:
Hussam Bakr, Phone City Birmngham LLC and Phone City Birmngham LLC d/b/a Cricket Wireless
Plaintiff:
R Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Kiley et al v. MedFirst Consulting Healthcare Staffing, LLC
as 2:2017cv01756
Plaintiff:
Jill Kiley , Marcus Payne , Alexander Berry and others
Defendant:
MedFirst Consulting Healthcare Staffing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Mosley et al
as 1:2017cv00436
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Tim Mosley and Melvin Pierce Painting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Glass et al v. O'Conner et al
as 5:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Tywana Glass , Sarah Smith , Deondre Burress and others
Defendant:
Daniel O'Conner, III, Douglas Weaver, Sr. and Salty Gator Trading Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
as 5:2016cv01493
Plaintiff:
Alexander J Harris
Defendant:
Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362
Thedford et al v. Drive In of Evansville Inc
as 2:2014cv00390
Plaintiff:
Shennetta Thedford , Brianna King , Decorelan Tompkins and others
Defendant:
Drive In of Evansville Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
