Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Diana Campuzano, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 08-7085
Plaintiff - Appellant: Diana Campuzano, Avi Elishis and Greg Salzman
Defendant - Appellee: Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Hamas and others
Alann Steen v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 08-5173
Plaintiff - Appellant: Alann B. Steen and Virginia Steen
Defendant - Appellee: Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and others
Interested Party - Appellee: United States of America
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: The Field Museum, The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, The Oriental Institute and others
Donna Holland v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 08-7063
Plaintiff - Appellant: Donna Marie Holland, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Robert S. Holland, deceased, Charles Holland, Rosemary Holland and others
Defendant - Appellee: Islamic Republic of Iran, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, also known as The Pasdaran and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: The Field Museum, The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, The Oriental Institute and others
Rubin, et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran, et al
as 08-8020
Plaintiff - Petitioner: JENNY RUBIN, DEBORAH RUBIN, DANIEL MILLER and others
Defendant - Respondent: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY, AYATOLLAH ALI HOSEINI KHAMENEI and others
Trustee - Respondent: HARVARD UNIVERSITY and MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
Rubin, et al v. Harvard University, et al
as 08-8021
Plaintiff - Respondent: ABRAHAM MENDELSON, STUART E. HERSCH, RENAY FRYM and others
Defendant - Respondent: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY, AYATOLLAH ALI HOSEINI KHAMENEI and others
Trustee - Petitioner: HARVARD UNIVERSITY and MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS
BODOFF et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00547
Plaintiff: JEFFREY BODOFF, SHLOMIT BARNEA, URI BARNEA and others
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY, AYATOLLAH ALI HOSEINI KHAMENEI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1602 Foreign Sovreign Immunities Act
BEN HAIM et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00520
Plaintiff: SETH CHARLES (KLEIN) BEN HAIM, BERNARD (KLEIN) BEN HAIM and LAVI (KLEIN) BEN HAIM
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY, AYATOLLAH ALI HOSEINI KHAMENEI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury None
RUBIN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2008cv00521
Plaintiff: JENNY RUBIN, DANIEL MILLER, ABRAHAM MENDELSON and others
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY, AYATOLLAH ALI HOSEINI KHAMENEI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury None
Rubin et al v. The Islamic Republic of Iran et al Featured Case
as 1:2007mc00448
Plaintiff: Jenny Rubin, Deborah Rubin, Daniel Miller and others
Defendant: The Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei and others
Rubin, et al v. Islamic Republic, et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2003cv09370
Plaintiff: Jenny Rubin, Deborah Rubin, Daniel Miller and others
Defendant: The Islamic Republic of Iran, The Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei and others
Respondent: University of Chicago and Gil Stein
Intervenor Plaintiff: Deborah D. Peterson
Amicus Curiae: The National Iranian-American Council
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?