Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Hanafy v. Bodum Holding AG et al
as 4:2020cv01110
Plaintiff: Jamie Hanafy
Defendant: Yachew, Ltd, BODUM Holding AG, Amazon.com Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rougier et al v. Applied Optoelectronics Inc
as 4:2019cv04721
Plaintiff: Kenneth X. Luthy, John Kugel, Roy H. Cetlin and others
Defendant: Applied Optoelectronics, Inc.
In Re: Amazon.com Inc
Archuleta v. Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00170
Defendant: Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Leidy Archuleta and Leidy Tatiana Carvajal Archuleta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gartner v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv02242
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc. and Hu Xi Jie
Plaintiff: Morgan Gartner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milton v. Amazon.com, Inc.
as 4:2017cv02720
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lorraine Milton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riley v. Amazon.com, Inc et al
as 7:2017cv00223
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc , Amazon.com LLC , Core Distribution, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Robbie Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avenue Innovations Inc v. Amazon.Com, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01067
Plaintiff: Avenue Innovations Inc
Defendant: Amazon.Com, Inc. , Simple Lifestyle LLC and Does 1-8
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
JE Matadi, Inc. v. Payless Beauty, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00202
Plaintiff: JE Matadi, Inc.
Defendant: Payless Beauty, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Case name not on file
as 4:2013mc01417
Receiver: Amazon.com, Inc
Plaintiff: Dennis Flaherty
Ethan Allen v. William Marsh Rice University
as 4:2013cv00376
Plaintiff: Subi Arumugam
Defendant: William Marsh Rice University , Amazon.com, Inc, Christopher M Jermaine and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?