Cases 1 - 10 of 251
Bartel v. Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00252
Defendant:
Alcoa Steamship Company, Inc., Amerada Hess Corp., American President Lines, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
William E Bartel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
MARTINEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2012cv30002
Plaintiff:
JULIUS MARTINEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
KIRKLAND v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58359
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. KIRKLAND
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
TORRES v. AMOCO SHIPPING CO.
as 2:2011cv52484
Plaintiff:
RUDOLPH H. TORRES
Defendant:
AMOCO SHIPPING CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. AMOCO SHIPPING CO., ET AL
as 2:2011cv46867
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMOCO SHIPPING CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COWART v. FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv45885
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. COWART
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
EATON v. FOSTER WHEELER CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv45886
Plaintiff:
MARVIN L. EATON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY, UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST , COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WADDY v. AMOCO SHIPPING CO.
as 2:2011cv41478
Plaintiff:
GASTONIA WADDY, JR.
Defendant:
AMOCO SHIPPING CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BUSH v. AMOCO SHIPPING CO.
as 2:2011cv41484
Plaintiff:
KERRY F. BUSH
Defendant:
AMOCO SHIPPING CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HAMILTON et al v. AMOCO SHIPPING CO.
as 2:2011cv35067
Plaintiff:
CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMOCO SHIPPING CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
