Cases 1 - 10 of 38
(PC) Rider v. Tan et al
as 2:2026cv02474
Plaintiff:
Andre Rider
Defendant:
K. Tan, Chief Medical Examiner, F. Enyeart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Vaden v. Vang et al
as 2:2026cv01892
Plaintiff:
Ernest Lee Vaden, Jr.
Defendant:
Dao Vang, Anise Adams and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Adams et al
as 2:2026cv01193
Petitioner:
Frank L. Johnson
Defendant:
Anise Adams, N. Malakkala, Valerie W. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gomez v. Lwin et al
as 2:2026cv00476
Plaintiff:
Jose Victor Gomez
Defendant:
Swe Lwin, Anise Adams and Gena Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Alcaraz v. Adams et al
as 2:2024cv00776
Plaintiff:
Teodoro Severiano Alcaraz
Defendant:
Anise Adams, S. Fears and F. Casillas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Shipley v. Adams et al
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Scott R. Shipley
Defendant:
Anise Adams and N. Malakkla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Morgan v. Adams et al
as 2:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Chris M Morgan and Christopher M. Morgan
Defendant:
Anise Adams, S. Fears and F. Casillas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bains v. Adams et al
as 2:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Surinder Bains
Defendant:
Anise Adams, Bertolino, F. Cassillas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keenan Wilkins v. Barber, et al
as 23-15511
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEENAN G. WILKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
BARBER, First Name Unknown, Doctor, S. GATES, R. RECAREY, Chief Executive Officer and others
Defendant:
CHRISTINE ESCOBAR and SPECIAL APPEARANCE
(PC) Harris v. Adams et al
as 2:2023cv00581
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Harris
Defendant:
Anise Adams, S. Fears and F. Casillas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
