Cases 71 - 80 of 796
George et al v. USAFRIK, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
Jason George, and successors as Trustees of the Operating Enginnering Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund, Timothy Gillen, and successors as Trustees of the Operating Enginnering Local #49 Health and Welfare Fund, Jason George and others
Defendant:
USAFrick Inc, Richard Anthony Mongo and USAFRIK, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Wagner et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00678
Plaintiff:
James Wagner, Johnathan Wagner, Boyd A. Walker, Jr. and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Vaught et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
James Vaught, Jeremy Jackson, Lee Ash and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Terranova et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Raymond Terranova, Eric King, Willie Cole Williams and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Sheadrick et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00374
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Sheadrick, Alfred Twyman, Michael O'bannon and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Payton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Alana Payton, Cole M. Radicic, Matthew Whelihan and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
