Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Antonio Gutierrez v. Nick Nguyen, et al
as 13-35918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO ALEJANDRO GUTIERREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NICK V. NGUYEN, Sergeant ,Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) Snake River Correctional Institution (SRCI), J. GILLUM, ODOC,SRCI Correctional Officer and REBECCA KRUEGER, Lieutenant
Antonio Gutierrez v. Nick Nguyen, et al
as 13-35802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO ALEJANDRO GUTIERREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
NICK V. NGUYEN, Sergeant ,Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) Snake River Correctional Institution (SRCI), J. GILLUM, ODOC,SRCI Correctional Officer and REBECCA KRUEGER, Lieutenant
Antonio Gutierrez v. Max Williams, et al
as 12-35158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO ALEJANDRO GUTIERREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MAX WILLIAMS, Director Oregon Department of Corrections, COMMISARY STORE OPERATOR, KEEFE GROUP/ ACCESS CATALOGUE COMPANY and others
Gutierrez v. Williams et al
as 3:2009cv06204
Plaintiff:
Antonio Alejandro Gutierrez
Defendant:
Max Williams, Commissary Store Operator and Access Catalogue Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gutierrez v. Belleque et al
as 3:2008cv00464
Petitioner:
Antonio Alejandro Gutierrez
Respondent:
Brian Belleque, Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Belleque et al
as 3:2008cv00311
Petitioner:
Antonio Alejandro Gutierrez
Respondent:
Brian Belleque, Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Belleque et al
as 3:2007cv00099
Petitioner:
Antonio Alejandro Gutierrez
Respondent:
Brian Belleque, Oregon Board of Parole and Post Prison Supervision and State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
