Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lopez v. Adelphi University
as 2:2023cv07022
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lopez
Defendant:
Adelphi University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Morales et al v. Fine Design Masonry, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv05817
Plaintiff:
Selvin Paz Morales, Edward Aguilar Rivera, Jose Otonul Aguilar and others
Defendant:
Fine Design Masonry, Inc. and Robert Tamburello
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez et al v. BMJ Concrete Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05510
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Lopez and Jose Efrain Lopez
Defendant:
BMJ Concrete Inc. and Bartosz Maziarz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00290
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jose Antonio Lopez Santiago v. USA
as 1:2016cv04600
Petitioner:
Jose Antonio Lopez Santiago
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Leon-Martinez et al v. Central Cafe & Deli et al
as 1:2015cv07942
Plaintiff:
Carlos Leon-Martinez , Fernando Meza Ramos , Victor Bautista Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Central Cafe & Deli, Deli Cross Enterprises, Inc. and Yeon-Whan Chu
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Lopez et al v. Pichardo 2230 Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2015cv00648
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lopez
Defendant:
Pichardo 2230 Restaurant Corp., Lazaro Pichardo and Ruben Pichardo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sapon-Garcia et al v. Metro Car Wash and Lube Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv04254
Plaintiff:
Ismael Antonio Lopez-Cerro and David Francisco Sapon-Garcia
Defendant:
Fernando Magalhaes and Metro Car Wash and Lube Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Batista et al v. 520 Happy Times, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv04240
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Batista and Nelson Antonio Lopez
Defendant:
520 Happy Times, Inc., Nicholas Cohen, Peter Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
