Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03942
Plaintiff:
Mirage Wine + Spirits, Inc. Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated doing business as Mirage Wine & Spirits
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Visa Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Steines v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2022cv03099
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Steines
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Doe et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2022cv02575
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Richard Robinson and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00561
Defendant:
Peacock TV, LLC, DirectTV Corporation, Hulu, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
City of East St. Louis, Illinois and City of East St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hazlitt et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2020cv00421
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Yolanda Brown, John Doe and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00249
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jones and Kyle Stirnaman
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Flaherty v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2011cv00359
Plaintiff:
Cynthia O'Flaherty
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meeker v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00607
Plaintiff:
Tim Meeker
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and AT & T Mobility, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Owens et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00479
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Owens and Barbara S. Owens
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Restricted Spending Solutions, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00093
Plaintiff:
Restricted Spending Solutions, LLC
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
