Cases 1 - 10 of 837
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2024cv14077
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Ruth Outlaw and Susan M Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Arnold et al
as 2:2024cv14078
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Susan M. Arnold and Ruth Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Wells Fargo Bank,N.A. v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2024cv14076
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank,N.A.
Defendant:
Ruth Outlaw and Susan M Arnold
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Arnold v. Car-D-Nel, Inc
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Robert Arnold
Defendant:
Car-D-Nel, Inc doing business as Maxi Auto Service Centers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Benefield, et al v. Department of Justice, et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Cynthia D. Benefield and Makayla B. Arnold
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States (Military) of America, Duval Teachers Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gray v. Miami-Dade County
as 1:2024cv20739
Plaintiff:
David Arnold Gray
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FORD v. MCNEILL et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
ALONZO FORD
Defendant:
MAC MCNEILL, MAURICE ARNOLD and DUSTIN MCCOY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHORTER-ARNOLD v. HINSON
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
CHRISSY NOELLE SHORTER ARNOLD and CHRISSY NOELLE SHORTER-ARNOLD
Defendant:
ERIC HINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv60210
Plaintiff:
Arnold Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv20469
Plaintiff:
Arnold Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
