Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Arnold v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart and Office of the Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold III v. Coleman et al
as 1:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold III
Defendant:
Jennifer Coleman, Judge Office, Mr. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Morgenthaler et al
as 3:2023cv03720
Plaintiff:
Arnold Reed
Defendant:
Richard Morgenthaler, Kimberly Hvarre, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv03086
Plaintiff:
Valdez Lamont Jordan
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell, Christal Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv02856
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jackson
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Chaplain Arnold, C. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fort v. People Of The State Of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv50262
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Isiah Fort
Defendant:
People Of The State Of Illinois, C. Jones, Troy Hadie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joyner v. Carlson et al
as 3:2023cv50197
Plaintiff:
Arnold Joyner
Defendant:
Angela Carlson, Randy Block, Brent Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. United States Trustees
as 1:2023cv02953
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Defendant:
United States Trustees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Arnold v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv02552
Petitioner:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Respondent:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2022cv02340
Plaintiff:
Jessie Williams, Brandon Jackson and Abdul Love
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Chaplin Arnold, C. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
